Skip to main content

So, everyone's going to get Libre on prescription on 1st November?!

In short, they're not. Nobody has them on prescription yet (edit 03/11/17 - almost nobody - there is some evidence that a few people might have them, but yet to be totally convinced). There are a small number that have persuaded their doctor/specialist to fund, but it's difficult to know exact circumstances and it hasn't been done in a coherent way.

The situation became different from 1st November, in that it is now possible to prescribe the Libre. However, the budgets are controlled by the local health authority (CCG) and ultimately they decide whether to fund or not and who to fund it for. There could be a chance that a GP/Specialist could go 'maverick' and prescribe without authority...but like current funding, will be rare and not coherently managed.

The problem the CCG have is two-fold. Firstly, budgets run from April to April. Starting funding in November means that they'll have to find extra cash from somewhere to fund the Libre - at least initially, it is going to cost more.

Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, there's not guidance from NICE about who should receive the Libre on prescription. There is limited health economic data and only a few large-scale trials.  Cost-effectiveness is yet to be proven any more than anecdotally.

As patients, our best bet for getting coherent funding of Libre is through patient groups like JDRF, Diabetes UK and Input. Rest assured they are working very hard to make Libre accessible to as many of the people that really need it as possible.

Speaking to doctors etc. may increase awareness, but as for funding across a wide area, the patient groups are the ones that are likely to make the biggest difference.

This information is gathered from my reading and speaking to interested parties, so if anyone has any other evidence or info, please share.

These two articles help:
http://www.inputdiabetes.org.uk/cgm/libre/ and http://www.inputdiabetes.org.uk/2017/10/access-flash/

Comments

PhilT said…
The case for NHS funding isn't black & white. Current user experiences are dominated by self selecting motivated users willing to fund themselves. The experiences of users on "free trials" or where NHS clinics apply the sensor to patients seem less clear cut.

The people with worst BG control are probably in denial or in some way impaired from getting on top of it, the Libre can give extra data but that doesn't help the data challenged.
3 November 2017 at 08:09
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Abbott dX 2022 Barcelona - "Make it Count"

For the past four years I've been invited by Abbott to a conference bringing together people with diabetes from across Europe to discuss various topics.  The first year I was meant to attend, it was my 'man v horse' year (the horse won!), so was unable to attend and then the pandemic hit so two further dX's were held virtually.  I was fortunate to be asked to present at last year's session.  This year's event was back in-person and held in Barcelona, coinciding with the latter part of the ATTD conference.   At this point, I must make it very clear - Abbott invited me to the 2022 European Diabetes Exchange forum (dX), that took place in Barcelona.  I attended this two-day event to connect and interact with inspirational and influential people in the diabetes community.  Abbott paid for my ticket and accommodation. #InvitedbyAbbott.  This is formal and it needs to be - I have not been required to do anything by Abbott as a result of my attendance and I hope that m
Post a Comment
Read more

mmol/l to mg/dl and back again...Why's it 18 times?

I posted this around 10 years ago, but now I have a whole new set of followers, thought I'd post it again! Americans use mg/dl as the unit for measuring glucose levels. Most other countries use mmol/l. The relationship between the two is that 1mmol/l = 18mg/dl. I was interested to understand this relationship (as a former chemist) and also find out what it meant in practical terms. It is a bit sad, but here is my calculation: The unit mmol/l stands for milli-moles per litre. (or liter in the US). milli means a thousandth, so what is a mole (other than a small rodent-like animal)? A mole is that quantity of a substance whose mass in grams is the same as its formula weight (atomic weight). Each molecule of glucose has 6 Carbon atoms, 12 Hydrogen atoms and 6 Oxygen atoms. A carbon atom weighs 12 units, a hydrogen atom weighs 1 unit and an oxygen atom weighs 16 units. These units are called relative atomic mass units (don't need to go into why). So the atomic weight of glucos
Post a Comment
Read more