Skip to main content

Driving with Libre - dispelling the myths?

Driving with Libre - dispelling the myths? (Group 1 Only - Standard Car Drivers)

It is absolutely true, the DVLA won't give you a licence unless you agree to the following:


The language, as with any legal document, is important here.  Group 1 is "recommended" and this is a "requirement for licensing".  I'm not a legal expert, but it does seem fairly clear, although not very satisfactory in my opinion.
Why does it say 'recommended' here?

So many times, I've seen people refer to breaking law if you're not a certain level or able to prove your level.  This is not what is being said.

At this point I must interject that it is irresponsible to drive any vehicle whilst low, going low or suspecting low.  Don't do it!  This is more about the law's view on levels and testing.

So, it now comes to why the law is at it is and why the Libre is not (yet) considered acceptable for the DVLA.  To get more information on this, you need to go back to the primary source - Secretary of State for Transport’s Honorary Medical Advisory Panel on driving and diabetes mellitus - reckon they could have come up with a catchier name!  Their publications.  From the March 2017 minutes (not published until September!):
From this, it's clear that whilst the guidelines doesn't currently allow interstitial blood glucose to be acceptable for driving, a change is being looked into.  Interestingly, in the rest of the EU, this wouldn't be a problem.

The final piece of the jigsaw is the potential law that is being contravened if you do use Libre as your only testing mechanism.  Firstly, the DVLA could in theory revoke your licence as they are unable to accept Libre readings as evidence of a blood glucose level.  It is a condition of licence-holding to follow what they say, regardless of the law.  Secondly, if you have a hypo whilst driving, you may be charged with driving under the influence of a drug (Insulin or diabetes tablet), driving without due care and attention, or dangerous driving (Link to useful leaflet).  There is indication that the under the influence statement may not even be likely to be enforceable.  In order to defend any of these charges, the Libre would probably not be considered admissible evidence.  You'd only be charged with these offences however, if there was due cause to believe that you were unfit to drive.  Personally, I believe that self-funding of Libre is evidence of effort to control levels and the debate in court could be an interesting one - I'm not sure this has been tested in law yet (and hope it doesn't need to be).

This interesting tweet from my local police force shows that levels weren't the prime concern even when there was an incident directly resulting from a 'diabetic episode'

This is a further element of diabetes care that people seem to get worried about.  It is right that you should know your levels and be controlled, but it is all part of the day-to-day management of the condition - not something to worry about.  Building testing into routines should be performed by all T1 diabetics (and probably T2s too) not just when driving but in order to effectively manage the condition at all times and in all situations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Abbott dX 2022 Barcelona - "Make it Count"

For the past four years I've been invited by Abbott to a conference bringing together people with diabetes from across Europe to discuss various topics.  The first year I was meant to attend, it was my 'man v horse' year (the horse won!), so was unable to attend and then the pandemic hit so two further dX's were held virtually.  I was fortunate to be asked to present at last year's session.  This year's event was back in-person and held in Barcelona, coinciding with the latter part of the ATTD conference.   At this point, I must make it very clear - Abbott invited me to the 2022 European Diabetes Exchange forum (dX), that took place in Barcelona.  I attended this two-day event to connect and interact with inspirational and influential people in the diabetes community.  Abbott paid for my ticket and accommodation. #InvitedbyAbbott.  This is formal and it needs to be - I have not been required to do anything by Abbott as a result of my attendance and I hope that m

4.0!

Took my levels this morning and they were at the magic 4.0mmol/l level (72 in US units)! Had a biscuit in celebration! Latest graph above. Seems less predictable than I thought, but at least I am now generally below 10 most of the time. I believe I am however in the 'Honeymoon Period'. This is the time when the body is still producing a little insulin and therefore your levels are easier to control. I don't think that it lasts long. A thick blanket of snow has fallen during the night. I was meant to be going to London today, but I think I'll give it a miss. My daughter (2) saw the snow and got very excited. She had not been out in snow before. We had an excellent half hour out the front of the house making tracks and getting cold! In my nice warm office now drinking a big mug of tea and looking at the snow continuing to fall. Won't be late home tonight.

Freestyle Liberating

So,what's all the fuss about? Today's graph with two Nutella-covered wraps - no Low Carb here! The Abbott Freestyle Libre is a paradigm-changing piece of medical equipment.  It has been warmly embraced by many of the diabetic community since its launch almost three years ago (its birthday is on 16th October).  So what's all the fuss about and is it justified? In my opinion, yes , but with some important caveats, especially with how you use it and interpret the results.  These are my tips for getting the most out of it: Use it for trends - stop thinking you need to compare it to other meters.  The only reason you should continue to test traditionally is to meet requirements of DVLA.  OK, if you are hypo-unaware, I can see logic in checking.  Yes, it can be 'inaccurate' but that's hard to quantify.  If you're far enough into your journey with diabetes, you should have a fair idea of what the scan is going to show.  If it doesn't match